For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Sonnemans, J., & van der Veen, A. (2019). Software and laboratory organization. In A. Schram, & A. Ule (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics (pp. 335-348). (Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110563.00028[details]
2016
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T., Sefton, M., & van der Veen, A. (2016). Discretionary sanctions and rewards in the repeated inspection game. Management Science, 62(2), 502-517. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2124[details]
Offerman, T., & van der Veen, A. (2015). How to subsidize contributions to public goods: Does the frog jump out of the boiling water? European Economic Review, 74, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.11.007[details]
2014
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T., Sefton, M., & van der Veen, A. (2014). Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 30(3), 623-648. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewt001[details]
2012
van der Veen, A. (2012). Inducing good behavior. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. [details]
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T. J. S., Sefton, M., & van der Veen, A. (2013). Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game. University of Amsterdam.
Offerman, T., & van der Veen, A. (2013). How to Subsidize Contributions to Public Goods: Does the Frog Jump Out of the Boiling Water? (CREED Working Papers). University of Amsterdam. http://www1.feb.uva.nl/creed/pdffiles/Frog.pdf[details]
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T. J. S., Sefton, M., & van der Veen, A. (2011). Encouraging compliance: bonuses verses fines. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Onderstal, S., & van der Veen, A. (2011). Keeping out Trojan horses: auctions and bankruptcy in the laboratory. (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper; No. TI 2011-024/1). Tinbergen Institute. http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/11024.pdf[details]
2010
Nosenzo, D., Offerman, T. J. S., Sefton, M., & van der Veen, A. (2010). Inducing Good Behavior: Bonuses versus Fines in Inspection Games. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Offerman, T. J. S., & van der Veen, A. (2010). How to subsidize contributions to public goods - Does the frog jump out of the boiling water? Universiteit van Amsterdam. http://www1.feb.uva.nl/creed/pdffiles/boilingfrog.pdf
The UvA uses cookies to ensure the basic functionality of the site and for statistical and optimisation purposes. Cookies are also placed to display third-party content and for marketing purposes. Click 'Accept all cookies' to consent to the placement of all cookies, or choose 'Decline' to only accept functional and analytical cookies. Also read the UvA Privacy statement.